If you are still having problems viewing this message, please click here for additional help.



Dearly beloved,

We are gathered here together, for better or for worse, for richer or for poorer, for funnier or, I hope, even funnier, to cast a jaundiced cartoon eye (and if you’ve ever had a jaundiced cartoon eye, you know how painful that can be) on a topic that’s much in the public eye these days: same-sex marriage, not to be confused with its hetero-normative near-homonym:

Marriage, gay or straight, is a serious business, not to be entered into unadvisedly, although once the date is set, the advice of counsel is not recommended:

It is clear that marriage should not be entered into lightly—unless you’re a cartoonist, in which case light is the right way to go:



Marriage has always been a bottomless well of inspiration for New Yorker cartoonists, who witness the challenge that any couple faces in attempting to make their union civil, often to no avail:


And while the current sea change in attitudes toward marriage has given many institutions mal de mer, for New Yorker cartoonists it has been a spring tide on a familiar subject.

Not that attitudes toward marriage haven’t evolved over the decades. Older cartoons often confronted issues both ridiculous and sublime, sometimes simultaneously:




Any kind of marriage can be a union of the heart, body, and mind—a wellspring of mutual joy and the foundation for a stable and loving environment. In which case, it has no place in cartoons:


That’s not to say it’s impossible to create a cartoon about marriage that focusses on the need for mutual understanding and sensitivity in a relationship. As many of us have learned through the years, it is important to enter marriage with realistic expectations.


Even though The New Yorkers cartoon record reveals a somewhat cynical attitude toward the sanctity, sanity, and stability of marriage, most cartoonists I know have tied the knot, and don’t consider it a noose. And some, like myself, have tied it, untied it, and tied it yet again.

Specious arguments against same-sex marriage aside,

an objection to same-sex marriage could be based on experiential, not moral grounds:

That objection notwithstanding, I can report that, when I asked New Yorker cartoonists if they approved of same-sex marriage, whether Republican or Democrat, straight or gay, all proudly said, “I do!”

Cheers,
CARTOON CAPTION CONTEST
CARTOON CAPTION CONTEST

Entries accepted through March 31st.

ENTER OR VOTE
THE 2013 DESK DIARY
DESK DIARY

Order your New Yorker Desk Diary today!

SHOP
CARTOON LICENSING
CARTOON LICENSING

Did you know that you can license cartoons for professional use? 

BROWSE CARTOONS
FROM THE ISSUE
FROM THE ISSUE

A slide show from the current issue.

WATCH

Copyright © 2013 Condé Nast. Sent from Condé Nast, 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 16th floor, New York, NY 10036, attn: Email Coordinator

UNSUBSCRIBE | VIEW OUR USER AGREEMENT | VIEW OUR PRIVACY POLICY